Re: MD Consciousness/MOQ, definition of

From: David Zentgraf (deceze@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 03:41:02 BST

  • Next message: Kevin Perez: "Re: MD A Christian interpretation of the MOQ"

    Hi Platt,

    >> We can't localize it,...
    > You localize it as "proprietary to every individual."

    In the end you can only localise the physical circumstances that lead
    to the production of consciousness, which you will usually find
    belonging to what we call "individuals". To localise consciousness,
    the subjective feeling itself, though is quite hard, if not impossible.

    >> universalize it,...
    > You universalize it
    > by suggesting "Everything in the universe is other to me."

    That's universalising everything else outside of consciousness, not
    consciousness itself.

    >> ...or even prove it.
    > You prove it by
    > writing "we can't even prove it." (Only human consciousness can
    > write.)

    Human consciousness is part of the physical process which leads to
    what others perceive as writing. Try proving the subjective feeling
    itself though.

    > As you know, consciousness to me is something my brain, and the
    > bulb of
    > nervous tissue of all critters, taps into. But, that's an argument for
    > another day.

    I'd be interested in that argument. You're saying that consciousness
    is something "out of this world", some higher sphere not belonging to
    this physical reality, and our brains are our physical connection
    that tap into it...? Please explain and define consciousness from
    this point of view.

    Chrs,
    Dav

    On 2005/09/04, at 23:53, Platt Holden wrote:

    > Hi Ham,
    >
    > In general, I agree with you that consciousness (awareness) is
    > characteristic of individuals, the corollary being there's no such
    > thing
    > as "collective consciousness." But, your final paragraph seems to
    > contradict itself in several respects.
    >
    >
    >> Because
    >> conscious awareness is subjective it is unlike anything else in
    >> the realm
    >> of scientific or philosophical investigation. We can't create it,
    >> localize
    >> it, measure it, universalize it, predict it, or even prove it.
    >> But, if the
    >> truth be told, it's the most "genuine" reality we have.
    >>
    >
    > You localize it as "proprietary to every individual." You
    > universalize it
    > by suggesting "Everything in the universe is other to me." You
    > prove it by
    > writing "we can't even prove it." (Only human consciousness can
    > write.)
    >
    > As you know, consciousness to me is something my brain, and the
    > bulb of
    > nervous tissue of all critters, taps into. But, that's an argument for
    > another day.
    >
    > Best,
    > Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 05 2005 - 03:49:09 BST