From: Scott Roberts (jse885@localnet.com)
Date: Mon Sep 26 2005 - 23:31:19 BST
Bo,
Bo said:
I must again apologize, maybe I lumped you in with Ham and
Scott and the rest of the non-understanders.
Scott:
Are you too assuming that the only way someone could disagree with you is
because they don't understand?
What's ironic is that I have from the first time I heard of SOLAQI agreed
with it that the value of the intellectual level in its origin lay with the
S/O divide. Where we disagree is whether that is the whole of intellect.
Which means that I prefer using 'intellect' in one way and you in another.
For example, I include mathematics in intellect, and in mathematics there is
no S/O divide (since the thinking is the mathematics -- there is no object
separate from the thinking that the thinking is about). I don't think it is
a matter of misunderstanding.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 27 2005 - 00:36:08 BST