From: MarshaV (marshalz@charter.net)
Date: Mon Oct 03 2005 - 11:11:19 BST
At 09:58 AM 10/2/2005, you wrote:
>Mark 30-9-05:
>Events may be either good or bad, and this clinches
>it. Although Universal flux is maintained by modern
>science and Buddhist metaphysics, that which can be
>said to exist in spite of it all are excellent events.
>This places morality right at the centre of it all,
>and banishes nihilism even though all is change.
Hi Mark,
Sorry to side tract you, but would you expand on this paragraph a
bit. Nihilism, good and bad?
If I wiped out an anthill, and ants were self-conscious, they might
judge the event 'bad'. But is it a bad event, or is it an
event? What does labeling an event good or bad accomplish?
Marsha
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 03 2005 - 12:57:01 BST