From: MarshaV (marshalz@charter.net)
Date: Tue Oct 04 2005 - 10:40:13 BST
At 12:46 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>Mark:
>In my Cybernetics and harmony thread i'm making a fine
>distinction between playing a violin and playing it
>bloody well! I'm suggesting, and it's just a
>suggestion, that the violin and player are in some
>sense primary sq patterns, but the performance, the
>excellent relationships which contribute to the
>performance are in some sense secondary and more
>moral.
Hi Mark,
Sorry to keep this going, but...
When I was in high school, I wanted to play the guitar. After a few
lessons, I heard myself playing 'Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star' badly,
and stopped. Later I married a man who played classical guitar. He
decided to learn Bach's Cello Suite No. 1. I heard many months of
playing that Bach piece which might have been labeled bad. Was
it? Or was there only playing the guitar? I think that from the
first notes of learning to the sharing through performance all was quality.
Or if one could zoom out to the edge of known space and look back at
ourselves, would our morality be meaningful? Or if one could
experience ourselves from the quantum point-of-view, would our
morality be meaningful? I think quality is in the moment, not in the
judgements.
I think there are no answers, but I still struggle with the questions.
Marsha
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 04 2005 - 11:25:55 BST