Re: MD Cybernetics and sq evolution - Secondary ontology as harmony.

From: Case (Case@iSpots.com)
Date: Fri Oct 07 2005 - 16:12:09 BST

  • Next message: khaled Alkotob: "Re: MD Terrorism"
  • Next message: Arlo Bensinger: "Re: MD Terrorism"

    > [Case]
    > Strike heresy insert silly.
    > Mark:
    > Pick up a piece of Horse shit and through it at a
    > statue of Jesus. A few Hundred years ago you would be
    > lucky if you did not have your heart cut out and
    > nailed to an Oak tree. Silly?
    > Today you would be arrested and thrown in clink for a
    > spell to cool off, and maybe charged for damages.
    > But if you threw your Horse shit at a Buddha statue, a
    > buddhist would not be offended.
    [Case]
    Technically throwing Horse shit at a statue of Jesus would be blasphemy not
    heresy but perhaps you are right about excessive quibbling.

    > Mark:
    > At this point, i'll thank you for helping me to think
    > about Cybernetics and sq evolution - Secondary
    > ontology as harmony. It's excitting to have remained
    > so close to the topic in hand.
    [Case]
    This was precisely the point of departure. You are placing Harmony in a
    secondary position. I maintain that Harmony is primary. It is the component
    missing from Pirsigs re-non-definition of the Tao into Quality. He seeks to
    place the emphasis on Value so the materialists can't dismiss it. He is also
    convinced that this imparts to MoQ the proverbial, 'you know it when you see
    it' quality. In Taoism harmony, the union of opposites, that is front and
    center. It is balance between poles that counts. It is the perception of
    harmony that leads one to follow "The Way" and to seek the proper
    relationships among thing.

    > Mark:
    > That's fine.
    > However, chaos is not DQ in the MOQ and RMP underlines
    > this in the 1993 AHP conference tape when he says, 'DQ
    > is not chaos' or something telling like that.
    > I don't equate chaos with anything other than
    > patterned nonesense. Patterned nonsense is analogous
    > to cancer in biological patterns, rioting in social
    > patterns, and Ham Priday in intellectual patterns.
    > I'm sure you get the drift.
    [Case]
    Do you know where that tape can be located?
    I get your drift but chaos is a word with many meanings. The one you are
    working with is not the one I am working with.
    For a some brief intros visit:
    http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci759332,00.html
    http://www.imho.com/grae/chaos/chaos.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory
    James Gleiks' "Chaos" offers a highly accessable account. I am convinced
    this is the stuff paradigm shifts are made of.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 07 2005 - 17:18:08 BST