Re: MD The 4th level renamed?

From: David Harding (davidharding@optusnet.com.au)
Date: Thu Oct 13 2005 - 03:02:08 BST

  • Next message: Arlo J. Bensinger: "MD Partisan Politics, Labels and Distraction (was terrorism)"

    Michael Hamilton wrote:
    > You replied:
    >
    >>Why shouldn't it? Because it doesn't. It's not permanent and non-changing, the MOQ does change. You've just changed it. See how it changes?
    >
    >
    > What on EARTH does my suggestion (that the MOQ is outside and above
    > the 4th level) have to do with the MOQ changing? Sorry David but that
    > was a total non sequitur.
    >
    > If anything, your insistence that the MOQ changes, supports my
    > suggestion. If the MOQ is not a static pattern, how can it be inside
    > the 4th static level? In fact this might be helpful, so thanks for
    > your reply anyway!
    >
    > Regards,
    > Mike
    >

    Mike,

    The MOQ is a static pattern, I am referring to it aren't I? We both know what we mean by it don't we? So it's not something of total change and chaos that neither of us can understand, but it's not
    entrirely fixed either, which neither of us can change. As you say, intellectual patterns "submit to a higher purpose" namely Dynamic Quality. So I think the MOQ is a pattern that we use and refer to
    as the best we've got at any moment and so in this sense it is fixed, but another moment thanks to Dynamic Quality we might have something better, so it changes.

    Apologies for the wrong name calling.

    -David.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 03:14:33 BST