Re: MD The 4th level renamed?

From: Michael Hamilton (thethemichael@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 12 2005 - 15:45:07 BST

  • Next message: Michael Hamilton: "Re: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)"

    Hi David,

    You quoted me, but under the name of Mark for some reason....:
    > > Just as the inorganic level submits to a higher purpose by allowing
    > > exceptions to the static law of entropy, just as the biological level
    > > submits to a higher purpose by allowing exceptions to the static law
    > > of "might makes right", just as the social level submits to a higher
    > > purpose by allowing exceptions to the static law of authority, so the
    > > logical level submits to a higher purpose by allowing exceptions to
    > > the static law of *definition*. The pattern is clear to see, is it
    > > not? So why shouldn't the MOQ stand above the fourth level?

    You replied:
    > Why shouldn't it? Because it doesn't. It's not permanent and non-changing, the MOQ does change. You've just changed it. See how it changes?

    What on EARTH does my suggestion (that the MOQ is outside and above
    the 4th level) have to do with the MOQ changing? Sorry David but that
    was a total non sequitur.

    If anything, your insistence that the MOQ changes, supports my
    suggestion. If the MOQ is not a static pattern, how can it be inside
    the 4th static level? In fact this might be helpful, so thanks for
    your reply anyway!

    Regards,
    Mike

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 12 2005 - 23:17:01 BST