Fw: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)

From: David M (davidint@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Sun Oct 23 2005 - 20:07:41 BST

  • Next message: David M: "Re: MD Rhetoric"
  • Next message: MarshaV: "Re: MD I Love Huckabees"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David M" <davidint@blueyonder.co.uk>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 8:03 PM
    Subject: Re: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)

    >
    >> Scott:
    >> I've got no real quarrel with the general idea here, just that it denies
    >> intellect the role that you are giving to DQ. As always, I do not
    >> understand
    >> the reluctance to refer to that which lays down "high level intellectual
    >> SQ"
    >> as intellect. We think. We are not just conduits for some divine force.
    >>
    >
    >
    > DM: I think a unique term can avoid the built up associations of the old
    > term,
    > I agree that DQ implies aspects of agency, value, intellect. I might add
    > eros, the quality of secondary qualities, etc. Sure we are individuals
    > and may be in a unique position to think something new, but are we the
    > author's of this power/capacity? Of course, being inseparable from a
    > divine power we are identical with it too. Contradictory identity?

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 23 2005 - 21:26:57 BST