RE: MD Looking for the Primary Difference

From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Nov 11 2005 - 05:08:27 GMT

  • Next message: Case: "RE: MD A Question of Balance / Rules of the Game"
  • Next message: Case: "RE: MD Looking for the Primary Difference"

    Sid,

    Your statements are anthromorphic but it is nothing
    what I had in mind and I think you know that. If you
    are going to respond to my question then respond to
    it. Nothing you says really shows me how there can be
    value without intellect.
    For the umpteenth time I am not saying a tree is
    intelligent like a human is intelligent.
    So a brain is what is required for intellect to you?
    And where did a brain com from...something
    nonintelligent? How did that happen? Why are your
    assumptions more reasonable?
    Do you have anything to offer to back up your
    assumptions besides assanine sarcastic suggestions?

    Erin

    --- siddhartha gautama <sariputra@hotmail.co.uk>
    wrote:

    > Erin wrote:
    >
    > >On a more serious note... it is hard for me to
    > imagine
    > >how any value does not involve intellect so to be
    > >convinced that trees don't have intellect I would
    > need
    > >to be able to understand how value can occur
    > without
    > >intellect. It is hard for me to imagine how that is
    > >possible.
    >
    > Yea, just the other day, in fact, my cat was telling
    > me how he has finally
    > figured out the optimum temperature at which he
    > should drink his milk.
    > Until then he had no idea whether he liked his
    > little feline tongue scolded
    > or not. Poor little bugger could hardly talk with
    > all those blisters. Good
    > job he's smart though because he has some dinky
    > little algorithms worked out
    > to stop it happening again.

    > This kind of anthropomorphic indulgence seriously
    > overburdens the term
    > 'intellect' in my opinion. When we hear of a bunch
    > of trees on the internet
    > debating whether or not humans have intellect then
    > I'll accept your
    > difficult-to-imagine-otherwise proposition.
    >
    > And for those, including yourself, who don't think a
    > brain is necessary for
    > intellect, please invite a houseplant (only if it's
    > qualified) to talk you
    > through the procedure to surgically remove your
    > brain and then report back
    > to us to confirm the veridical merit of your
    > conjecture.
    >
    > Sid
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 11 2005 - 05:38:10 GMT