RE: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists

From: Matt poot (mattpoot@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Nov 26 2005 - 16:52:55 GMT

Next message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Quality, DQ and SQ"

Next message: Matt poot: "MD FW: Re: [MF] the way forward for MoQ discussion lists"

Previous message: Platt Holden: "RE: MD Two Theses in the MOQ"
In reply to: Case: "RE: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists"
Next in thread: Case: "RE: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists"
Reply: Case: "RE: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,

Thats a very good point case. I think that the meaning of words can bungle
things up a lot.

The issue of "miraculous creation" (something from nothing) also brings an
issue to surface, of what I was concerned with.

Did the inorganic exhibit any form of purpose? This is why I'm wondering if
we can call evolutionary forces (DQ-SQ interaction) purpose , for the sake
of this discussion.

what do you think?

POOT

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Quality, DQ and SQ"
Next message: Matt poot: "MD FW: Re: [MF] the way forward for MoQ discussion lists"
Previous message: Platt Holden: "RE: MD Two Theses in the MOQ"
In reply to: Case: "RE: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists"
Next in thread: Case: "RE: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists"
Reply: Case: "RE: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 26 2005 - 18:23:44 GMT