From: Case (Case@iSpots.com)
Date: Mon Nov 28 2005 - 13:31:00 GMT
[DM]
It looked like you did not get my point but then you got better....
My point of course is that prior to selection or order there has to be an
underlying infinity and that this assumption is ignored in all SQ seeking
theories. Or in other words DQ prior to SQ as you say. I quite like the idea
that DQ
(infinity) has to withdraw to allow SQ (finity) to exist.
[Case]
Well, actually I would say that Quality is the underlying infinite and that
DQ and SQ emerge as the interplay of order and chaos. I think calling the
"concept of change" SQ leads nowhere and means nothing.
[DM to Platt:]
A valid point I think, therefore we live in a universe that has been taking
a specific rather than a random walk into the possible, seeking quality.
[Case]
The walk appears specific because it has been taken. Retracing the step
leads down a twisting trail of colliding circumstances and collapsing
probabilities.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 28 2005 - 18:28:32 GMT