Re: MD Intellectual Art (Ayn Rand)

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:20:03 GMT

  • Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD A conflict of values"
  • Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD SOM and the soc/int distinction"

    Hi Steve, Rick, All:

    STEVE:
    > I think it was Steve Martin who said something like "Talking about art is
    > like dancing about poetry."

    Nice. Thanks for the quote.

    > As for putting art on a level or defining art, I think it is interesting
    > that part of art is to ask the question, "Is this art?" The minimalist
    > movement exemplifies this aspect of art. (e.g. If I just paint a canvas
    > white and fram it, "is this art?" What if I just make one blue line across
    > the canvas?)
    >
    > "Is this art?" could be translated as, "does this have quality?" or "what
    > is Quality?" It may be an attempt at defining the undefinable.

    Agree. Another question to ask of art, borrowed from teenage
    vernacular, "Did it blow me away?"

    > Art is aimed at DQ--at transcending static patterns, though it could only
    > ever fall short. In this way, art may be a "high quality endeavor" and
    > simultaneously a degenerate activity.
     
    Pirsig doesn't say as much about the arts as he might have. The reason
    may be contained in the following passage from Lila, Chap. 13:

    "Third, there were moral codes that established the supremacy of the
    intellectual order over the -social order-democracy, trial by jury, freedom
    of speech, freedom of the press. Finally there's a fourth Dynamic
    morality which isn't a code. He supposed you could call it a "code of
    Art" or something like that, but art is usually thought of as such a frill
    that that title undercuts its importance."

    There's a hint here that art might be an unrealized fifth level, an idea I've
    argued for in the past. It seems to me that if evolution is headed in any
    direction it is toward beauty rather than ever increasing physical
    comforts, freedoms and longevity. Of course, a world where beauty is
    universally recognized as the highest value and is pursued with the
    same vigor as fame and fortune are pursued today lies far in the future.
    But, art points the way.

    RICK:
    What level do "aesthetic patterns" belong to in the MoQ?

    They may belong in an unrealized fifth level. That's where I'd like to put
    them. But, I can't find much encouragement from Pirsig. What do you
    think?

    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 28 2003 - 14:21:35 GMT