From: Joe (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 18:24:41 BST
On 05 May 2003 at 1:16 AM Sam writes:
Hi Joe,
This was really interesting. At the moment I don't have a direct comment; I
just want to mull on it
for a while. If I could try to summarise it, would it be fair to say the
following: that all of
reality is quality, but whether it is sq or dq depends entirely upon our
perception?
Sam
Hi Sam,
joe: Thanks for your interest! I find it difficult to summarize the taste
of a 'stew'. The words you have chosen are fruitful. To say that all of
reality is quality turns around into all of quality is reality. I would
introduce a distinction based on moral orders, so I have a sense of the
distinction between reality and being. One man's meat is another man's
poison.
"entirely...perception" Again you use a fruitful word 'perception!' It is
hard to capture the meaning of perception. I add de, in re, ad, con, ex, to
the root and each time a little more meaning appears. 'Perceive' and
'conceive' introduce 'mind' into an already difficult mixture. As long as
going to the bathroom is not eliminated by 'perception' and it is meaningful
to you, why not? I prefer intuition or instinctive sense of feality for a
summary of the difference between dq and sq in a pattern, but there is no
accounting for my taste.
Joe
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 06 2003 - 18:22:16 BST