From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Sat May 10 2003 - 03:51:53 BST
Squonk,
squonk:
> I once thought as you and freely used to suggest that DQ was creative, but i
> feel it may be better to say that DQ is the source of creativity. That leaves
> room for DQ being the source of disintegration, which can often be the result
> of too much dynamic intervention.
> I hope this makes sense?
Steve:
I think I understand your point.
> Further Steve, please be very careful when thinking about the Classic/Romantic
> split, which is not of Pirsig's origin. This Split is an old western
> philosophical tradition and received some illumination in ZMM. Again, as
> postings i have made to this forum will amply show, i too have confused C/R
> with Static/Dynamic MoQ.
> The inside/outside thing you have going may be because of this? I am not sure.
Have you written a summary of the MOQ that you are happy with? If so, I'd
be interested to read it.
> You will not get a patronising pat on the back 'well done sonny jim' from me,
OK by me.
> but what you will get are the results of my having banged my head against the
> wall over the MoQ. And you are welcome to it. You must be. Its yours. Its
> important. I am at your service.
Thanks,
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 10 2003 - 03:50:26 BST