Re: MD Re:The Quality event.

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Sat May 10 2003 - 14:12:56 BST

  • Next message: phyllis bergiel: "Re: MD What's the difference?"

    Steve:

    Have you written a summary of the MOQ that you are happy with? If so, I'd
    be interested to read it.

    Hi Steve,
    No i have not. I don't feel any desire to either.
    Having said that, i do feel there is huge potential for MoQ research.
    However, the research conducted so far has been primarily of an, 'Here is MY
    interpretation' sort, which is a waste of creative energy in my view. A
    better path for research, and one i try to undertake myself, is an 'Here are
    some insights provided as a direct illumination of the MoQ' sort.

    (What follows is a bit 'soapbox' so feel free to stop if you like!)

    In my view, the path of research undertaken so far may be analysed using the
    MoQ itself. In this regard, my criticisms of this forum are an example of the
    MoQ at work? I hope so anyway. Applying MoQ thinking to the forum reveals, if
    i am near the target, social patterns of value having come to undermining
    intellectual potential. There has been much of great value - Lila's child,
    the work by Anthony McWatt, but i feel there is so much more potential. I
    emphasise this for this reason: The MoQ is such a challenging perceptual
    shift from the one provided by western culture, that it will require many
    people to forge the path ahead. It's time to get to work and build upon the
    significant and excellent work already done, and what has already been done
    by those who have applied themselves should deserve all the attention it
    deserves. Sadly, this is being fogged and left unattended. No one, for
    example, said a word about McWatt's last essay? And that is precisely the
    application of MoQ thinking to some of our cultural problems?
    That's my 20/20 hindsight view as provided by the my understanding of the
    MoQ. Nothing i say is written in stone and must be challenged, of course. No
    problems with that.

    What can be done next to help?
    The MoQ says little about that, because one cannot use the MoQ as a crystal
    ball. However, having an excellent view of where you've been may be a good
    guide to where you may be going? That's very helpful wouldn't you say? And to
    this end i decided to influence social stasis with a dynamic intellectual
    approach: satire. That's a moral activity in MoQ terms, because if satire is
    an intellectual activity, then it may be moral to use it to undermine social
    stasis?
    But is satire an intellectual activity? Well, people have been killed because
    they satirised. The social status quo can find it very threatening. Satirists
    throughout history have been damn lucky if they get away with it. Even the
    court fool, who provided possibly the only real mirror for an individual
    surrounded by hellish deceit had to be careful never to be anything less than
    completely honest. See how that is an example of satire being used BY social
    patterns for their own safety? The fool's trade is pure, 100% real - anything
    less could mean death? And its also exceptionally dynamic wouldn't you agree?
    Or can be anyway. Would you not agree that good satire is rather like jazz
    improvisation? When it hits the mark, it is leaving the total repertoire of
    current static patterning and becoming something new?

    I wonder what the MoQ has to say about satire? I would venture satire is
    intellectual quality. Without intellectual patterns satire becomes social
    badgering. Am looking into this over the summer...

    (The soapbox is thankfully retreated.)

    I would suggest reading 'Zen in the art of archery' by Euen Herrigel, 'The
    meeting of East and West' by FSC Northrop, and The guide to ZMM - which is
    easily found. Indian and Zen thinking as a long haul, but woefully neglected
    in the forum.

    With regard to your inside/outside thing, i would suggest dropping that. This
    distinction is misleading. That's something you may wish to DO rather than
    TALK about? You are the real motorcycle, and this forum would do well to help
    us in this regard.

    Best of luck,
    squonk.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 10 2003 - 14:13:58 BST