From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Fri May 16 2003 - 02:35:40 BST
So in this way, the Quality event is:
1. Dynamic response
2. Intellectual response (rational)
and perhaps
3. Social response (symbolic)
4. Biological response (sensory)
5. Inorganic response (??) (thermodynamic equilibrium between stove and
flesh)
sq: Hello Paul,
Dynamic Event leaving the following static patterns:
1. Inorganic value patterns. (Thermodynamic equilibrium between stove and
arse)
3. Biological patterns. (sensory)
4. Social patterns. (symbolic. "Bloody Hell! - oh! wash my mouth out with
soap and water.")
5. Intellectual patterns. (rational. "Check next time.")
If 1. is an appropriate distance, then the Dynamic event is pleasurable. If
too far away, too static. (You don't warm up.) If too close too Dynamic, (You
get burned.)
The appropriate distance is best. And what is more, if judged to perfection,
will not require further adjustment. (You will be comfortable for how ever
long you remain at that position in relation to fuel burn rate of stove,
ambient weather conditions, clothing, etc.) That best equilibrium are
empirically observable beyond immediate human experience proves there is
something not analogous, but related to our own immediate experience of
Quality.
Thoughts?
squonk
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 16 2003 - 02:37:12 BST