Re: MD Quality events and the levels

From: Paul Turner (pauljturner@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Fri May 16 2003 - 11:22:12 BST

  • Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Quality events and the levels"

    Hi Squonk

    > If 1. is an appropriate distance, then the Dynamic
    > event is pleasurable. If
    > too far away, too static. (You don't warm up.) If
    > too close too Dynamic, (You
    > get burned.)

    Patterns change each other through interaction /
    coalescence?

    > The appropriate distance is best. And what is more,
    > if judged to perfection,
    > will not require further adjustment. (You will be
    > comfortable for how ever
    > long you remain at that position in relation to fuel
    > burn rate of stove,
    > ambient weather conditions, clothing, etc.) That
    > best equilibrium are
    > empirically observable beyond immediate human
    > experience proves there is
    > something not analogous, but related to our own
    > immediate experience of
    > Quality.

    Observable 'best equilibrium beyond immediate human
    experience'? You mean Physics experiments? Or more
    common observations of nature? Formation of
    snowflakes, boiling water, is that the kind of thing
    you mean?

    Also, when you say equilibrium, I think of static
    good, Dynamic good is disrupting equilibrium, in a
    way. I think you mean something other than static
    equilibrium, can you expand on that?

    cheers

    Paul

    __________________________________________________
    Yahoo! Plus
    For a better Internet experience
    http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 16 2003 - 11:22:54 BST