From: phyllis bergiel (neilfl@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Thu May 29 2003 - 04:27:17 BST
Hi Johnny:
>
> We often talk about nearness to DQ when talking about experience, and
> furthest evolved toward DQ when talking about levels. I think I've heard
it
> said that the Intellectual level is the furthest evolved toward DQ. Yet
> when we talk about experience, we often note that the intellect is the
last
> thing to get the direct experience of DQ, the "quality event" is
> pre-intellectual.
>
> Is there anything to this apparent opposite hierarchy of nearness to DQ of
> the the levels versus experience? Perhaps the intellect, realizing it is
> removed from DQ, tries to create its own patterns to get it back to DQ,
> whereas inorganic reactions are so close to pure DQ experience that atoms
> don't feel any need to "evolve" to get something back that they never
lost?
>
Sorry to be the voice of dissent again, but I believe the biological and the
social levels are much more removed (or mediated) timewise than the
intellectual and DQ. Evolution and social acceptance seem to occur much
more slowly than intellectual reasoning building the argument for
assimilating the DQ with a static latch, don't you think?
phyllis
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 29 2003 - 04:22:16 BST