From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Mon Jun 02 2003 - 21:13:27 BST
Wouldn't Squonk agree that there are better ways to spend the night? But
then, just getting that biological quality is not socializing either.
Social quality is about the connection between people at a very individual
biological level and is all about being moral and doing what is expected.
Social quality is felt when the social experience proceeds as you expect it
to, and you have very strong expectations that it will continue to.
Hi,
Yes. My point is that if DuMB had in fact been exposed to higher Quality
intellectual intercourse then he would probably see Wilber's corpus for what it
is? (And i feel confident he will given time and a bit of quiet reflection and a
nice cup of hot cocoa.) The trouble with on-line discussion is that one can
simply ignore point blank that which you don't value. The voice of the forum
then becomes dominated by a fundamental tone, which of late has been in the key
of Wilber flat. Face to face intellectual intercourse is not like that, for a
sense of social well being demands a fair hearing.
DuMB likes the sound of his own voice. Nothing unique in that. But don't you
feel it requires an acute aesthetic sense of value to intuit when it is
appropriate to be quiet? Otherwise, the verbal diarrhoea becomes a bit off putting?
The MoQ may have allot to say about this very sense? That's what gave me the
idea.
squonk
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 21:14:08 BST