From: Pi (pi@mideel.ath.cx)
Date: Tue Jun 03 2003 - 17:52:48 BST
Hi Nic,
Firstly, I would like to point out that under MOQ I don't believe there is
anything which can be considered "bad". In fact, if I take a purist
stance, I would say that nothing can be considered "good" either! But lets
not do that. Something is considered "bad" only when it is compared to
something else "better" than it. Notice the relativity.
I think we are talking about the same thing, but we are a little confused
over the definition of relativity and the viewpoint each of us is
adopting.
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] nic nott wrote:
[snip]
> The purpose of the discussion ,as I see it , is to remove the static
> intellectual filters , which are the things that prevent us seeing/being
> perfection
>
I would have to disagree. In fact, that statement is a contradiction. You
are saying that "the purpose of the discussion (a static intellectual
pattern interaction) is to remove the static intellectual filters..." It
is like reading a book on zen and hoping that it will help you reach
enlightenment. In my opinion, this discussion helps us better understand
the static patterns. In a way, it helps us better define it by letting us
draw a boundry around it. This whole process is still a static pattern.
Take care,
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 03 2003 - 16:56:58 BST