From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 06:55:40 BST
Hi all interested in MF resurrection,
> RICK
> I agree with all of this. But I had another idea about the static latching.
> What I was thinking was that for each topic we could pose a question on
> which to focus (eg. "Do the Lila's Child comments help clarify the
> social/intellectual divide?" or "Does the Eudiamonic MoQ present a superior
> conception of the 4th level to that presented in LILA?"). The question is
> answered at the end of each discussion by every participant with a 'yes' or
> 'no' and a brief paragraph (100 words or less) explaining why they "voted"
> the way they did. Whoever proposed the topic would take note of the
> 'informal' vote and each participant's brief explanatory paragraph would be
> added to the bottom of the final summary.
>
> what do you think?
That sounds great, and might be better than a written summary by one of the participants or a
proposer. One other thing I've been mulling on - and have asked about before - is whether there is
the possibility of an area on the site for 'classic posts' or 'FAQs', just so that some of the
accumulated insights might not be lost in the sea of words. Just a thought.
Sam
"Phaedrus is fascinated too by the description of the motive of 'duty toward self' which is an
almost exact translation of the Sanskrit word 'dharma', sometimes described as the 'one' of the
Hindus. Can the 'dharma' of the Hindus and the 'virtue' of the Ancient Greeks be identical?" - The
Eudaimonic MoQ says yes. "Lightning hits!"
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 01 2003 - 07:36:07 BST