Re: MD Should sodomy be a right?

From: Valence (valence10@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 03 2003 - 21:34:45 BST

  • Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Racism in the forum."

    Hey Johnny,

    J
    > OK, that was a stereotype, but the existence of the stereotype must mean
    > something.

    R
    While there may or may not be a kernel of truth behind every stereotype, I
    think that's a very dangerous line of argument to pursue. In this
    particular
    case, my own experience doesn't bear out the notion that most gays are
    intellectuals. I think you see it that way because you associate
    intellectualism with liberal social progressiveness and think that gays must
    be liberal and progressive because they desire social tolerance for their
    sexual preferences. But I think that's wrong. I think that most gays
    aren't really any more socially progressive than most heterosexuals are....
    with the exception of their one personal issue (but hey, everyone has some
    issues--- does that makes us all intellectuals?).

    J
      I stand by the main point, which is that intellectualism and
    > homosexuality are related.

    R
    Is there a converse relationship between heterosexuality and
    anti-intellectualism?

    J
     If non-intellectuals are gay, ie, if any person
    > becomes gay not by thinking-about-it too much but by copying behavior, it
    is
    > because the intellectual pattern is starting to take hold as a social
    > pattern. (Though there may be hormonal and genetic conditions that may
    > contribute to being gay, it is an intellectual construct that says that
    > people with those biological patterns can't be straight.)

    R
    Are you familiar with the writings of Michel Foucault? Here is a webpage
    briefly summarizing some of his vast ideas
    (http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/history_of_sexuality.htm). I would be
    interested in your opinion of his theories.

    J
    > Right, except I think now it is heterosexuals who are dying in their wars.

    R
    Which wars would these be? Are you suggesting that the war in Iraq or
    Afghanistan is a part of some "homosexual agenda"? Does that mean that Bush
    is in on it as well?

    J
    > Any statute is "unenforcable" if it criminalizes something that is
    primarily
    > done in private.

    R
    Murder is primarily committed in private. So is rape. Drug use usually
    occurs behind close doors... I could go on all day listing enforceable
    statutes that criminalize behavior that occurs primarily in private.

    take care
    rick

    First say to yourself what you would be; and then do what you have to do. -
    Epictetus

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 03 2003 - 21:33:50 BST