Re: MD The Giant (types of patterns/types of people)

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 17:08:22 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD types of patterns/types of people"

    Hi Rick,

    >For whatever reason,
    > unlike other animals who had evolved extra sharp senses, claws, teeth,
    > horns, etc, etc...for humans, it was the brain that evolved to give them
    > the edge needed to make the Darwinian cut. And for millions of years it
    > went on like this, packs of biological humans using their biological brains
    > to solve biological problems... really no different than packs of wolves
    > using their teeth and noses to solve the same problems. At this point I
    > would see the existence of only 2 levels, Inorganic and biological. The
    > "intellect" is still no more than a biological pattern serving a biological
    > purpose. Biology was 100% of the equation that determined our behavior and
    > thoughts.

    What "tool" of survival does a biological brain give a human if not
    intellect--"the collection and manipulation of symbols in the brain?"
    After all, a mouse has a biological brain, but exhibits no evidence of
    abstract thought. How do you explain the cave paintings at Lascaux if not
    by the symbolic brain power of prehistoric humans?

    You appear to be advocating that early man had automatic knowledge of how
    to survive, i.e., his instincts allowed him to make the Darwinian cut. I
    would suggest that man's distinction from animals is his need to choose
    in the face of alternatives. He has no automatic knowledge of what course
    of action he must take to stay alive like wolves do. As you point out, his
    only tool of defense is his brain. Man must get his knowledge and choose
    his actions by using his brain to think with, that is, by utilizing
    intellectual patterns, rudimentary as they might have been in those early
    stages.

    Jonathan wrote that the potential for the evolution of all levels emerged
    with the Big Bang. I agree. Subsequent evolution is a history of level
    dependence and dominance. All levels had found a "home" when humans
    emerged. Then the social level, followed by the intellectual, became
    dominant in turn.

    Platt
               

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 17:06:52 BST