Re: MD The Giant (types of patterns/types of people)

From: Joe (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Tue Jul 08 2003 - 17:45:02 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Patterns of value."

    On 7 July 2003 9:08 AM Platt writes to Rick:

    Platt:
    What "tool" of survival does a biological brain give a human if not
    intellect--"the collection and manipulation of symbols in the brain?"
    After all, a mouse has a biological brain, but exhibits no evidence of
    abstract thought. How do you explain the cave paintings at Lascaux if not by
    the symbolic brain power of prehistoric humans?

    You appear to be advocating that early man had automatic knowledge of how to
    survive, i.e., his instincts allowed him to make the Darwinian cut. I would
    suggest that man's distinction from animals is his need to choose in the
    face of alternatives. He has no automatic knowledge of what course of action
    he must take to stay alive like wolves do. As you point out, his only tool
    of defense is his brain. Man must get his knowledge and choose his actions
    by using his brain to think with, that is, by utilizing intellectual
    patterns, rudimentary as they might have been in those early stages.

    Jonathan wrote that the potential for the evolution of all levels emerged
    with the Big Bang. I agree. Subsequent evolution is a history of level
    dependence and dominance. All levels had found a "home" when humans emerged.
    Then the social level, followed by the intellectual, became
    dominant in turn.

    Hi Platt, Rick Jonathan and All,

    joe: I have been attempting to work out the elements of an instinctive
    sensing of reality, intuition. I am convinced that Pirsig depends on
    intuition when he proposes that we know undefinable dq in a pattern. In an
    instinctive sensing of reality the explanation for our actions is the
    apprehension of the dq aspect of 'purpose' in the pattern.

    I have a question: is 'purpose' simple or complex? I would answer, complex!
    Yet we do only one thing. The complexities of 'purpose' seem to be included
    in a specific action in the form of an 'octave' so to speak. How do I begin
    to distinguish the 'tones' in undefinable 'purpose' in my awareness? I can
    say I train my instincts, like a baseball player who can hit a 95MPH
    fastball for average. It seems reasonable to say that I don't put
    everything I have into each action! Actions progress!

    When finally this whole pattern enters my awareness, I can reflect on what I
    have done, and see ways I could have done it better. I do not know if this
    problem with 'purpose' is any more or less complicated than distinguishing
    the inorganic, organic, social, intellectual properties in the dq aspect of
    'existence' in the pattern.

    Early man had a different approach on how to survive and grow. I think that
    "speaking from the heart" is different from repeating from memory patterns
    which may be distorted in my awareness, giving the impression I speak with a
    forked tongue. I am apalled that I can now destroy all life on earth! I do
    not claim that I have evolved from the me who was more trained in the
    instinctive nature of my behavior!

    Joe

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 08 2003 - 17:41:58 BST