From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 17:08:22 BST
Hi Steve,
> Steve:
> Platt, then what is the point of Pirsig including an inorganic level if the
> levels refer to types of people rather than types of patterns of value? Do
> Pirsig's patterns of value fit anywhere into your understanding of the MOQ?
I'm afraid I don't understand your question. Are you implying that the
inorganic level doesn't affect people? Or that the inorganic level exists
independent of people?
> I disagree that levels that don't refer to types of people but rather to
> types of patterns are "abstract as some sort of Platonic forms" or "pies in
> the sky." Values are real in my book. They don't exist in some Platonic
> realm but rather they comprise our experience.
Absolutely. The key words are "our experience," presuming people having
it. That's the whole basis of the MOQ.
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 17:16:46 BST