Re: MD types of patterns/types of people

From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 18:03:21 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Should privacy be a right?"

    Hi Platt,
     
    >> Steve:
    >> Platt, then what is the point of Pirsig including an inorganic level if the
    >> levels refer to types of people rather than types of patterns of value? Do
    >> Pirsig's patterns of value fit anywhere into your understanding of the MOQ?
    >
    > I'm afraid I don't understand your question. Are you implying that the
    > inorganic level doesn't affect people? Or that the inorganic level exists
    > independent of people?

    My point is that it doesn't make sense to think of 'inorganic' as a type of
    person so types of people clearly are not what the levels were designed to
    represent even if it is often useful to apply them in that way.

    Thanks,
    Steve

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 18:03:09 BST