Re: MD The Intellectual Level

From: skutvik@online.no
Date: Wed Jul 16 2003 - 14:36:35 BST

  • Next message: skutvik@online.no: "RE: MD Intellect and its critics"

    Jonathan, Rick & Humanity

    It's just me butting in. Rick you made an excellent observation when
    you said:

    "All four levels exist 'post-intellectually', but note that in this sense
    'intellectual' is NOT the same as the level of the MOQ called
    'intellectual' .........etc" Please stand firm and don't let yourself be
    seduced by Jonathan. He says:

    > This is a lot less convuluted if you leave out the Intellectual LEVEL.
    > That the Inorg, Biological and Social levels represent
    > post-intellectual reality is an inocuous truism.

    My dictionary don't say what "inocuous" is, but I guess it's enforcing
    the truism content. Rick correctly observed that the static hierarchy is
    NOT post-intellectual-LEVEL. What he calls "intellect" is of course the
    dynamics that brought Intellect out of Society. All levels are post-DQ,
    that is a truism, but it makes MOQ a joke to insist that the levels -
    along with MOQ itself ...DQ INCLUDED - are intellectual patterns.
    Calling it post-intellectual doesn't make the slightest difference.
    Where's everybody's logic?

    Your truism is a MOQ equivalent of SOM's solipsism "everything-in-
    our-minds" and if you state that all Q-realities are intellectual realities
    then you are forced to accept the SOM variant, but I guess that you,
    Jonathan, protested solipsism when you were a somist (we all were
    until we got acquainted with the MOQ)

    Hope I don't sound like Squonk.
    Bo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 16 2003 - 14:38:00 BST