From: Jonathan B. Marder (jonathan.marder@newmail.net)
Date: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 07:32:10 BST
Hi Platt,
Jonathan said:
> I don't see the S/O divide as a social pattern. It is an
> (intellectual) description of perception AT ALL LEVELS.
Platt replied:
Since "perception" is an S/O term (perceiver/perceived) it appears your
definition of the S/O divide is circular. I read it as "The S/O divide
is an intellectual description of the S/O divide at all levels."
Jonathan replies:
Shoddy logic there Platt. Perception itself is not S/O terminology in the
sense you mean,
but perceiver/perceived is indeed S/O terminology, used to intellectually
describe the concept.
Whether you call it perception, awareness, a "quality event" or whatever,
you can always find appropriate S/O terminology, which is what makes it so
damn useful.
Jonathan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 01 2003 - 07:33:57 BST