RE: MD The S/O divide

From: Jonathan B. Marder (jonathan.marder@newmail.net)
Date: Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:02:18 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD A metaphysics"

    Hi Bo and all,

    JONATHAN
    > The issue is of how discreet patterns are discerned from what we
    > assume to be a continuum of reality. Clearly this involves primary and
    > secondary waves of perception, that build up to what you and I would
    > call an (intellectual description). You might choose to resolve this
    > into a primary preintellectual process (direct experience?) an
    > secondary abstraction process.

    BO replied
    OK, but this sounds what all thinkers before Pirsig (or oblivious of
    him) has said. "Intellect" is the usual mental/mind vessel where ideas
    slosh around. But enter the MOQ where intellect is something else
    than mind (in the same way that the inorganic level is something else
    than matter)

    JONATHAN
    According to *PIRSIG's* MoQ, mind=Intellectual+Social levels
    He says so explicitly in Lila (not that I like it)

    BO
    Thus "intellectual description" is reality describe from the intellectual
    level, no great revelation that, but intellect is not a mind realm, rather
    the value of separating the abstract from the concrete.

    JONATHAN
    Abstract vs. Concrete heh!
    If that isn't Descartes, then I don't know what is!!!

    BO
    What is
    described in ZAMM as pre-intellectual and gives rise to the
    subject/object reality is the intellectual LEVEL of the MOQ, but there
    are three more levels where no such division exists!.

    JONATHAN
    That may be according to Bodvar's MoQ, but is nothing like what Pirsig said.
    He said that the "Social level" is on the mind and subject side of the
    Cartesian split.
    I don't find that approach to be useful

    JONATHAN (before)
    > >"I don't see the S/O divide as a social pattern.
    > >It is an (intellectual) description of perception AT ALL LEVELS."

    BO
    ...it looked promising at first. You don't see the S/O as social and that
    makes it intellect - I hoped(!) - but "...an intellectual description of
    perception at all levels" sounds like everything is intellect!? As if there
    were no inorganic, biological or society realities before intellect, only a
    diffuse pre-intellectual "continuum".

    JONATHAN
    I stand by it - patterns at all levels can be "intellectualized".
    That's what pattern description/definition is!

    Sincerely,

    Jonathan

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 11 2003 - 17:03:06 BST