Re: MD Dealing with S/O

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:08:25 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Dealing with S/O"

    Dave M:
    I would say the activity of mind
    is DQ but memory and all its workings in terms
    of re-cognition and perception is SQ. So SQ/DQ have
    to work together in what we call mind.

    Regards
    DM

    Hello Dave,
    I wish to distance myself from the statement that DQ = mind.
    I agree with your assertion, which is also essentially that of the MoQ; Mind,
    a term we can actually dismiss if we choose to, is a repertoire of static
    intellectual patterns evolving in response to DQ. These patterns are very often
    socially approved, and this provides another good argument for dismissing the
    term 'mind.'

    (DQ may also disrupt a repertoire of static patterns to the extent of
    non-viability.)

    Your assertion that activity of the static repertoire is Dynamic appears to
    correlate very well with the MoQ.

    While you and i agree with the MoQ, there are many who do not. I should urge
    those who do not agree with the MoQ to first state the MoQ position as it is
    before introducing their own terminology and/or challenging arguments. I feel
    this is a matter of intellectual integrity - anything else is unacceptable.
    Mark

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 24 2003 - 20:14:20 BST