Re: MD Re: MOQ:What is a person.

From: David Harding (davidharding@optusnet.com.au)
Date: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 01:44:45 BST

  • Next message: james marshall: "Re: MD Joseph Cambell"

    On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 07:51 am, David Buchanan wrote:
    > David MOREY asked:
    > In the context of MOQ what do we think is a good description of what it is
    > to be a person?
    >
    > Paul Turner replied:
    > > Another answer is provided in a piece of Buddhist literature I recently
    > > quoted:
    > >
    > > When questioned by Mara "what is a person?", Vajira answered "Mara, why
    > > do you insist on the word "person"? There is nothing here but a group of
    > > processes. Just as the word "cart" is used when the parts are combined,
    > > so the word "person" is commonly used when the five skhandas* are
    > > present."
    > >
    > > * Skhandas means something like "impermanent heaps" - body, feeling,
    > > perception, karma and consciousness
    >
    > dmb says:
    > Yea, I see it. These "impermanent heaps" are like the various levels of
    > static patterns, and we ARE a forest of static patterns. A pile of heaps.
    >
    > And may I add...
    >
    > Its true that in the MOQ, there is no self. That little person behind the
    > eyeballs is a kind of fiction, but Pirsig doesn't allow this ego-deflating
    > fact to lead us to any nihilistic conclusions. Neither does it allow a
    > solipsistic idealism, where each of us exists in our own world. This static
    > reality is not the primary reality, but I suspect there's a good reason he
    > calls it static QUALITY and its certainly real in some sense of the word,
    > its the only thing we CAN know. (Ain't that a bitch!) And in spite of the
    > "impermanent", secondary and misleading nature of it all, the book includes
    > biographical and historical examples to explain a moral code. It all seems
    > to assume that we have to act as morally responsible agents.
    >
    > Maybe Paul will take a crack at that one. I'm hoping you'll back me here,
    > but I'd be interested in any case.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > dmb
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    I'd say that a person is the collection of Static Patterns of Value, capable
    of apprehending Dynamic Quality.

    -David H

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 06 2003 - 01:44:04 BST