Re: MD Intellectual level - New letter from Pirsig

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Tue Oct 07 2003 - 18:14:30 BST

  • Next message: David MOREY: "Re: MD Re: MOQ:What is a person."

    Sam

    The last question is: is there any version of metaphysics
    that can start without agency if it is to produce a
    cosmos which is capable of producing the sort
    of self-awareness that humanity establishes in this one?
    I was wondering if anyone wanted to talk about agency
    as an epi-phenomenon of evolution. Personally, I think
    any such approach is incompatible with MOQ. I wonder
    sometimes if all the talk about 4th level intellect looks a bit
    like making agency an epi-phenomenon. Even, can we imagine
    agency without intellect?

    Regards
    David M
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Sam Norton" <elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 12:05 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Intellectual level - New letter from Pirsig

    > Hi David,
    >
    > I missed this in my first run through.
    >
    > I think I would want to echo Augustine - that in God we find our freedom,
    ie in the ability to be
    > open to DQ (and where it directs us) we are no longer bound by the static
    (social and intellectual)
    > patterns which have formed us. As such, if we have agency, then yes, I
    think it probably does
    > partake of the infinite.
    >
    > I'm afraid I don't see the logic behind your last question - but it sounds
    interesting!
    >
    > Sam
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "David MOREY" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
    > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:08 PM
    > Subject: Re: MD Intellectual level - New letter from Pirsig
    >
    >
    > > Sam
    > >
    > > Seems to me that it is here that we start to be unable
    > > to draw a line between Man/Being/God. Is that what you're
    > > thinking? Can't see how you can't begin ontologically with agency, what
    is
    > > very strange is that there is a patterned, repeating, static, finite
    > > cosmos. Pure agency is surely infinite, we may say divine,
    > > and free. Yet we have a cosmos of repeating patterns and
    > > continued emergent creation. Seems to me that you get
    > > patterns/repetition if you sacrifice your agency, if you value
    > > what has been created, enough to do it again, loving it,
    > > allowing it to endure. Is there any alternative to this approach
    > > that does not produce a non-aware cosmos in any form?
    > >
    > > regards
    > > David Morey
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: "Sam Norton" <elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk>
    > > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 6:15 PM
    > > Subject: Re: MD Intellectual level - New letter from Pirsig
    > >
    > >
    > > > Hi Paul, anyone,
    > > >
    > > > Just while I'm working on a few things relating to this.... ;-)
    > > >
    > > > In his letter to you, Pirsig writes:
    > > > > You have to cut it off somewhere, and it seems to me the
    > > > > greatest meaning can be given to the intellectual level if it is
    > > > > confined to the skilled manipulation of abstract symbols that have
    no
    > > > > corresponding particular experience and which behave according to
    rules
    > > > > of their own.
    > > >
    > > > Do you have any idea about who or what might be *doing* the
    manipulation
    > > (ie, who or what has the
    > > > 'skill')? Or is it that the symbols react to Quality on their own,
    without
    > > an intermediary? Or
    > > > something else?
    > > >
    > > > Sam
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > > Mail Archives:
    > > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > > >
    > > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 07 2003 - 18:16:29 BST