Re: MD Two theories of truth

From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 03 2003 - 01:40:45 GMT

Next message: Paul Turner: "RE: MD When is an interpretation not an interpretation?"

Previous message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD Two theories of truth"
Maybe in reply to: David Buchanan: "MD Two theories of truth"
Next in thread: abahn@comcast.net: "RE: MD Two theories of truth"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

DMB said:
For Rorty, there is little else but intersubjective agreements, analogies all the way down, as the neo-prag might say.

Matt:
Since Pirsig says "Everything is an analogy" in ZMM, this is why I favor ZMM. For to drop that line in the movement to Lila, I think, is to move back to the realm of SOM.

Matt

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Paul Turner: "RE: MD When is an interpretation not an interpretation?"
Previous message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD Two theories of truth"
Maybe in reply to: David Buchanan: "MD Two theories of truth"
Next in thread: abahn@comcast.net: "RE: MD Two theories of truth"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 03 2003 - 01:44:49 GMT