From: Marc Brookhuis (brookhuis1@zonnet.nl)
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 22:06:46 GMT
Hi, (as a longtime lurker)
A question which I came up while reading again ZMM, after having read it
for many times (and also Lila), there is still a thing that bothers me
looking at Quality.
I know Pirsig talks about the big Quality, compared with the Tao, the
thing you can't measure.
But I still think there is also this Little Quality,
f.e. This painting has more quality than that other painting, or this
bike is better than that one.
In both cases you only have to look at the characteristics (?) or
properties of the object.
Another example is a good and bad knife. One is a normal sharp
knife, the other f.e broken.
The first one has more 'Little quality' because it fullfills better its
function.
Can anybody tell me the relation between the two of them? Or, is there
any relation?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 06 2003 - 22:07:29 GMT