Re: MD quality is ...?

From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 21:49:52 GMT

  • Next message: Marc Brookhuis: "MD little quality"

    Hi Nathan, All,

    Nathan said:
    > Well, I just finished ZMM. I read the last paragraph this afternoon. So,
    > what is there to say. I'm not sure I liked it. There were parts that were
    > excellent and parts that were too turgid for my taste, but who am I to say
    > what turgid is?
    >
    > I want to ask you whether you would say that 'soul' is another word for what
    > ZMM calls Quality? And I am having trouble with 'expectation' as the
    > synonym. Could you perhaps elaborate?

    I don't particularly like 'expectation' though Johnny Moral seems to get a
    lot of mileage out of it. I certainly don't think it is a key to unlocking
    ZMM. 'Soul' doesn't get me anywhere in understanding Quality. See below.

    It's interesting that you're not sure that you liked ZMM. The sense I
    sometimes get from those on the list is that the world would be better off
    if everyone read it (and Lila as well) which reminds me of those folks who
    try to get people to read the Bible. The Bible isn't likely to mean
    anything to the hypothetical non-Christian who is finally convinced to pick
    it up. He won't even get passed so and so begat so and so before he is
    completely turned off by it. I wonder how many people are turned off by
    Pirsig's books for each of us who found his books to be so mind-blowing.

    The AP English students at my high school (I teach math and statistics) read
    ZMM (though not part IV which the teacher says isn't so great). I was
    excited to hear that our kids are reading it, but was disappointed after
    talking to to many of them about it because none of them were crazy about
    the book.

    At first I thought that they were too young to get it. But our AP kids are
    sharp and are capable of following the reasoning, so its not about smarts.
    I think it's more an issue of having a sense of the cultural disease that is
    being diagnosed. I think to appreciate Pirsig, you have to come into it
    already uncomfortable with the answers that modern secular thinking gives us
    about the world and ourselves.

    So, Nathan, is your ambivalence about ZMM that you're not sure about the
    existence of a disease or not convinced that Pirsig has suggested a workable
    cure?

    Also, I understand that you're not sure what Pirsig means by Quality. Here
    I'd like to give a an explanation of Pirsig's philosophy in100 words or
    less. I'd like to...

    I may give it a try later, but I think there are others (especially Platt
    and Paul) who could do a better job.

    Fellow MOQers, what do you say when someone asks you what Pirsig is about?
    Do you have a brief lecture at the ready for social situations that will
    pique the interest of friends and relatives rather than put them to sleep?

    Regards,
    Steve

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 06 2003 - 21:51:11 GMT