Re: MD string theory

From: August West (augustwestd@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Nov 11 2003 - 16:49:30 GMT

  • Next message: Gert-Jan Peeters: "Re: MD string theory"

    Nathan,

    funny coincidence, my pops is a real nova buff, he was
    telling me about this theory just the other day.

    I never liked the tree and the forest debate, because
    there is a tree and there is no other. if you mean the
    forest as in all things in the forest well someone
    else should know..if you are asking me, you are asking
    the wronng cat, unless I was in the forest, then I may
    or may not have heard it, and it may or may not have
    been real.... I've been hearing the phone ring
    recently and it wasn't really ringing.. (LSD
    flashbacks are a deadhead's blessing)... I think this
    "forest" question is asked poorly.. and it is
    unanswerable by anyone.

    as to your question about human perception of
    dimensions....

    you say: String theory
    > postulates that all matter and all radiation
    > (photons, heat etc) is composed
    > of vibrating strings of energy. That, these strings,
    > are the ultimate
    > reality; the strings vibrate in 11 dimensions. Since
    > we can't imagine 11
    > dimensions, is it fair to say that only 4 dimensions
    > exist and the strings
    > are unreal?
     
    August says:
    Just because you can't imagine it doesn't mean it
    isn't real. It seems this is more an idenity problem
    than anything.....

    ...You can imagine that I am human.. but can you
    imagine what I look like for sure??.. You only
    perceive me through words on a computer. which is not
    what I look like, but is my dq in a sq form... i.e. my
    creation, but stuck in time.. and stored and sent
    electronicly... until it gets to you and you perceive
    it.

    when you perceive my message.. does it give any clues
    to who I am?... maybe.. Does it tell you for sure who
    I am?...nope.

    Dimensions.. huh.. funny, it reminds me of one of my
    excuses to eat LSD.. back in the day.. I used to be
    able to perceive things with many layers.. I can't
    explain that kinda thing, its too tied to the
    experience... what the hell is a dimension anyway?!?

    This theory makes me think, DYNAMIC QUALITY!...I'd be
    willing to bet that this theory develops further, and
    someday you might be able to imagine 11 dimensions,
    once more is known about strings and dimensions for
    that matter.. this is all new stuff. It hasn't been
    tested in time yet and we haven't experienced it to
    the point of having its idenity's certainty being as
    certain as the idenity of an apple.

    THOUGHTS?

    -AUGUST

    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
    http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 11 2003 - 16:50:43 GMT