From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 17 2003 - 18:25:52 GMT
Elephant,
Elephant said:
'Perceptive', you mean. OK. So Matt, I suppose what you are saying is that you don't have much reason to talk about 'sense-perceptible' at all, not normally anyway.
Matt, it looks like what you are saying is 'I see what I see'. Why would anyone challenge that? I see all kinds of things all the time, although I don't see many tigers. Like, just now I see I'm going on a bit but that I might turn out to have a point if only I can see it through.
So that's Matt.
Matt:
Well, that was strange Mr. Philosopher. I think what I mean is a bit closer to "Truth as correspondence works with tigers." I'm a typical neo-pragmatist, if that helps. All I want to say is that typical perceptions that people have, like of rain and tigers, can be subject to a "test" like "correspondence," like looking outside or peering into the jungle. Nothing controversial like representationalism.
Matt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 17 2003 - 18:26:31 GMT