From: elephant (elephant@plato.plus.com)
Date: Sun Nov 16 2003 - 14:43:03 GMT
> Scott said:
> Thus you miss the point when you give examples that are true by
> correspondence. Truth by correspondence only works when the example consists
> of sense-perceptible particulars, as is the case in your examples. But as soon
> as generalities are involved, truth by correspondence doesn't work.
Are there any sense-perceptible particulars?
What do you mean by 'sense-perceptible'?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 16 2003 - 14:45:33 GMT