Re: MD matt said scott said

From: Scott R (jse885@spinn.net)
Date: Tue Nov 18 2003 - 02:37:36 GMT

  • Next message: Scott R: "Re: MD Pinker says.."

    Elephant,

    > > Scott said:
    > > Thus you miss the point when you give examples that are true by
    > > correspondence. Truth by correspondence only works when the example
    consists
    > > of sense-perceptible particulars, as is the case in your examples. But
    as soon
    > > as generalities are involved, truth by correspondence doesn't work.
    >
    >
    > Are there any sense-perceptible particulars?

    Yes.

    > What do you mean by 'sense-perceptible'?

    Sense-perceptible particulars are the objects and events we see, hear,
    touch, smell, and taste. By "see" (to refer to your later post) I mean
    physical sight, not insight or understanding.

    - Scott

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 18 2003 - 02:45:39 GMT