Re: MD The Logic of Contradictory Identity

From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2003 - 15:32:47 GMT

Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD When is an interpretation not an interpretation?"

Previous message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Language in the MOQ"
In reply to: Scott R: "Re: MD The Logic of Contradictory Identity"
Next in thread: Scott R: "Re: MD The Logic of Contradictory Identity"
Reply: Scott R: "Re: MD The Logic of Contradictory Identity"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Scott,

> Because of the L of CI, I think your "I see intellect as a type of static
> pattern which must follow DQ" as inadequate to intellect, that it reflects
> the nominalist bias of modern philosophy, including the MOQ.

Can you explain "nominalist"? (I did put a Dictionary of Philosophy on my
Christmas list.)

Thanks,
Steve

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD When is an interpretation not an interpretation?"
Previous message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Language in the MOQ"
In reply to: Scott R: "Re: MD The Logic of Contradictory Identity"
Next in thread: Scott R: "Re: MD The Logic of Contradictory Identity"
Reply: Scott R: "Re: MD The Logic of Contradictory Identity"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 26 2003 - 21:12:41 GMT