Re: MD matt said scott said

From: Scott R (jse885@spinn.net)
Date: Thu Nov 27 2003 - 03:27:50 GMT

  • Next message: Scott R: "Re: MD Self-consciousness"

    David R,

    > I grasped perfectly well that you were making a negative claim about
    > correspondence, namely that it does not work in such and such cases. But
    in
    > order for you to make that negative statement you must *mean* something by
    > 'correspondence', and so everything I have said about your explanation of
    > that concept applies.

    I mean no more by "correspondence" than can be found in a dictionary. Do I
    need to define every word I use? If I am going to use a term in some
    non-conventional way, I need to say what that is. That is not the case here.

    - Scott

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 27 2003 - 03:44:04 GMT