From: David R (elephant@plato.plus.com)
Date: Fri Nov 28 2003 - 00:08:16 GMT
OK Scott, have the dictionary. But what you did before was to offer a
non-dictionary philosophically interesting explanation of correspondance and
it is that explanation which you offered that I wanted to talk about. You
don't. End of topic.
TTFN
David R
> From: "Scott R" <jse885@spinn.net>
> Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:27:50 -0700
> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Subject: Re: MD matt said scott said
>
> David R,
>
>> I grasped perfectly well that you were making a negative claim about
>> correspondence, namely that it does not work in such and such cases. But
> in
>> order for you to make that negative statement you must *mean* something by
>> 'correspondence', and so everything I have said about your explanation of
>> that concept applies.
>
> I mean no more by "correspondence" than can be found in a dictionary. Do I
> need to define every word I use? If I am going to use a term in some
> non-conventional way, I need to say what that is. That is not the case here.
>
> - Scott
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 28 2003 - 00:10:50 GMT