RE: MD Democracy in the MOQ

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Dec 07 2003 - 20:11:20 GMT

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD Fifth Level?"

    David M and all y'all:

    DM asked:
    Glad to see your approach does not try to simplify history.
    Clearly the problems of WWI and the depression, hyper-inflation,
    war reparations, communist agitation, ineffective government,
    saw a desperate nation see dictatorship and the fuhrer principle
    as a means of escaping its predicaments and the burden of
    a squabling democracy. USA today is very different. What are the
    factors taking the USA down its current road do you feel?

    dmb answers:
    Right. I still remember phrase I ripped-off for my thesis on Hitler. I'd
    asserted that the rise of fascism in Germany was due to "a particular
    sociological constellation". Since then, however, I've come to think that
    its a pretty weak explanation insofar as it construes fascism as a unique
    event. If that were true, then it would have no connection to the rise of
    fascism in Italy, Spain, Portugal, several of the Eastern European countries
    or the re-emergence in recent years in the form of punk skinheads and the
    American right-wing militia movement. This is why I think Pirsig's
    description of fascism as an anti-intellectual re-assertion of social values
    is so helpful. His explanation allows us to see the thing much more clearly
    and it allows us to see it even in a variety of sociological circumstances,
    even in non-Western cultures, such as the case of Islamo-fascism.

    More to the point, I suppose you'll have to accept a mediocre answer to your
    question about today's American version of the same, because I don't have a
    very good one. 9/11 certainly helped to accelerate it. LOts of it is due to
    the "angry white guy" stuff; a reaction to the liberal progress made by
    racial minorities, women, gays and lesbians and secular culture in general.
    It has lots to do with the tendency of (SOM) intellectuals to be be
    dismissive or even openly hostile to traditional morallity, religion and the
    transcendental realm. These are genuine conflicts, but I also think all of
    this, and more, has been artifically pumped up and aggravated by the media
    and by politics.

    I give brief examples of each. In the last 10 or 15 years a web a right-wing
    media organs have developed into what is pretty accurately called an "echo
    chamber". It goes back at least to the 1970's when Adolf Coors financed the
    formation of the Heritage Foundation and some small media outlets, but it
    really took off about the time Clinton was first elected in '92. As talk
    radio and the internet began to blossom even more right-wing millionaires
    and billionares like Richard Mellon Scaife and Reverend Moon began to
    finance magzines and newspapers like the Weekly Standard and the Washington
    Times. Once all the pieces were in place, the web would operate on a sort of
    trickle up basis. Scandalous stories would begin in the ghetto, either on
    internet sites like the Drugde Report or on radio talk shows like Rush
    Limbaugh's. The same stories would then work their way up into said print
    media, then the mainstream papers and magazines and before long the same
    dubious stories would be broadcast on the major networks. The stories would
    bounce around for weeks or months until the volume and repetition became
    such that only a deaf and blind person could avoid it. This is how the
    famous Lewinski sex scandal became serious news and lead to the impeachment
    of a President. It started on the Drudge report and ended in the Senate. And
    this is only the most famous such story. This same echo chamber also painted
    Clinton as a drug runner, an thief, a murderer, as the father of an
    illegitimate black child and more. The man couldn't even get a new dog
    without some sinister motive being assigned to it.

    Politicians got just as ugly during this same period. Newt Gingrich
    orchestrated a Republican take over of the House of Representatives, for
    example, by unifying all House races under a single tatic. Namely, he sent
    out instructions to all candidates telling them to repeatedly refer to
    liberals and liberalism as "corrupt", "sick", "perverted" and the like.
    There was also a nation wide effort by Republicans to transform the House
    through re-districting. Most Americans have heard about the recent efforts
    By Tom Delay to do this in Texas, but it has been happening nationwide in
    '81, '91 and '01. Not only are they trying to change the borders of
    congressional districts in their own favor, which is really nothing new and
    is done by both sides, but they've also gone out of their way to make sure
    that they are as many Black Democrats as possible. They hope to make
    Democrats into the minority party in more ways than one. One of the chief
    Republican operatives by the name of Benjamin Ginsberg has dubbed this
    effort "operation ratfuck". Did I mention that this was ugly? There is lots
    more to tell, but I imagine you see the point by now. Through media and
    politics there has been a concerted effort to demonize anything liberal or
    intellectual and it has done so by appealing to the most hateful and ugly
    sides of human nature. And its working.

    like I said, this is only a mediocre answer and things are far more detailed
    and complicated than I could ever express in a single post, or even a single
    book. But you could probably take any part of this sketch and look it up for
    yourself. Its not easy, but its out there. I saw some of this happen first
    hand. (I worked in talk radio for five years during this period and am
    ashamed to admit that I gave Matt Drudge a microphone way too many times.)
    But I'm also not saying anything that hasn't already been written about by
    others.

    So, the short answer is... The reason that we're looking so fascist these
    days is quite simply because people have been working so hard at it.

    Thanks,
    dmb

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 07 2003 - 20:24:24 GMT