From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Tue Mar 09 2004 - 01:44:24 GMT
Dear forum,
To the extent that Dynamic activity produces static patterns which reflect
the Godhead it may be worth considering SQ-SQ coherence in this regard?
Taking the sum total of all static patterning, the degree to which coherence
may be reached is that degree to which Dynamic Quality, or the Godhead may be
exemplified with you.
The implication of this may not readily impinge itself upon many who simply
read these words? If one reflects upon the implications of SQ-SQ coherence and
the Godhead, it may become clear that it is in the here and now, all the time,
and to some degree or other. There are no exceptions.
Therefore, experience indicates that it is absolutely moral for the Godhead
in more coherent SQ-SQ patterned relationships to propagate coherence - to 'fan
out like waves' and raise into coherence patterns in disunity.
This may be accomplished in simple everyday inclusive behaviour. Being so,
why does disunity often prevail, and does this not contradict the assertion that
the Godhead resides everywhere without exception?
I feel a vocabulary is at hand: Taking the sum total of all static
patterning, the degree to which coherence may be reached is that degree to which Dynamic
Quality, or the Godhead may be exemplified with you.
The pressure of evolution is towards more coherent relationships and towards
DQ. Along the way, less coherent relationships are, by MoQ definition, less
exemplifying, though exemplifying non the less.
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 09 2004 - 01:47:23 GMT