From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Tue Mar 23 2004 - 10:38:04 GMT
Dear Jim,
You answered 22 Mar 2004 21:00:28 -0500 Steve's (arborealman@comcast.net) 22
Mar 2004 21:00:28 -0500 criticism of your 21 Mar 2004 14:14:09 +0000 posting
as 'off subject' with:
'Too voluminous and full of tangential meanderings maybe, but not, I think,
completely off topic.'
Please keep in mind that when I started this thread (10 Mar 2004 23:32:28
+0100) the subject was whether people are interested in an 'Idols'-like
competition between religions as a practical test of the validity of the MoQ
(Do we really experience Quality or not?) that answers the question Matt P.
asked Platt 19 Feb 2004 00:46:40 -0500:
'in your "opinion" which is the best religion?? Which represents the epitome
of human civilisation?'
That implies presenting religious practice, asking clarifications,
criticising factuality of descriptions of practice (sparingly, so as not to
polarize the discussion) and ... voting. Quality of religious content (like
the quality of the songs themselves in 'Idols') is better left out of the
discussion as much as possible.
Consistency of practice with content IS relevant of course.
I will create a new thread where we can discuss religious content and the
necessity of religion: whether god exists or not, whether DQ = God, whether
faith is needed, what 'faith' means etc.
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 23 2004 - 10:44:33 GMT