Re: MD quality religion

• Previous message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."
• Maybe in reply to: Wim Nusselder: "MD quality religion"
• Next in thread: Matt poot: "Re: MD quality religion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Steve,

I like your little dialogue. It pretty well matches my thoughts on the typical a/theistic debates. I just have no real interest in them anymore, and most of the traditional answers don't do very well in capturing what I think. Speaking with the vulgar, I may say I'm an atheist, but I say it with grave misgivings.

And when one says that the MoQ is atheistic, I think there is an important kernel of truth there, but the difficulty in using those traditional categories arises when you ponder Pirsig's assimilation of mysticism. I think it may be the same discomfort Buddhists have when they are described as atheists:

"I guess so...."

Matt

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

• Next message: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD quality religion"
• Previous message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."
• Maybe in reply to: Wim Nusselder: "MD quality religion"
• Next in thread: Matt poot: "Re: MD quality religion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 24 2004 - 22:26:05 GMT