From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Wed Mar 24 2004 - 22:05:41 GMT
Dear Matt P.,
You asked Platt 19 Feb 2004 00:46:40 -0500:
'in your "opinion" which is the best religion?? Which represents the epitome
of human civilisation?'
You now (23 Mar 2004 07:34:56 -0500) ask (quoting Pirsig):
'Need we anyone to tell us what is good, and what is not good? (best)'
No, you needn't have asked, but you did and Pirsig pretended that the MoQ
could give an aswer. If quality were really so self-evident, we would need
neither morals, nor inquiries into values (like 'Zen ...'), nor inquiries
into morals (like 'Lila ...') and our whole discussion of the MoQ would be
pointless.
Will you participate in testing the MoQ on religion? Alternatively ... if
you don't need anyone to tell you which is the best religion, you surely can
tell us...
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 24 2004 - 22:41:29 GMT