Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere.

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Sat Mar 27 2004 - 15:38:01 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere."

    Platt:
    If carbon atoms are still being created in stellar systems, it's a static
    system doing the creating, not DQ. Again, processes understood by science
    that create predictable results are static patterns.

    Best regards,
    Platt

    Hi Platt,
    You are tying yourself to a scientific conceptual model here. That is an
    intellectual pattern which has been replaced by the MoQ.
    If you imagine yourself to be in a cosmos where there is as yet no Carbon,
    Oxygen, or any elements other than Hydrogen or Helium, you would note the
    emergence of these elements as a result of value preferences at the subatomic level.
    Of course, you cannot do this because you are made of star dust.
    Star dust is the result of Inorganic evolution - there have to be a number of
    Suns born and gone supernova before planetary systems may evolve upon which
    Organic life may thrive - a Dynamic process.

    Are you advocating determinacy Platt?
    Are you suggesting physics as we understand it is a totally static and
    predictable?

    If so, you are using an out of date conceptual model based on scientific
    paradigms rather than the MoQ. In the MoQ, DQ and SQ are always together as
    aspects of Quality.
    From Pirsig's Metaphysics of Quality:
    11. Why is evolution an important consideration in the MOQ?
    Evolution is an important consideration in the MOQ as a code of ethics can be
    generated from the four basic levels of quality patterns. Though each level
    of static patterns have emerged from the one below, each level follows its own
    different rules i.e. there are physical laws such as gravity (inorganic), the
    laws of the jungle (biology), co-operation between animals (society), and the
    ideas of freedom and rights (intellect). It is important to note that the
    different laws of the four static levels often clash e.g. adultery (biological
    good) v. family stability (social good).
    The MOQ combines the four levels of patterns to produce one overall moral
    framework based on an evolutionary hierarchy (as seen on the MOQ diagram). The
    entity that has more freedom on the evolutionary scale (i.e. the one that is
    more Dynamic) is the one that takes moral precedence. So, for instance, a human
    being is seen as having moral precedence over a dog because a human being is at
    a higher level of evolution.
    The MOQ does not follow any theories of evolution that are finalistic or
    postulate some form of teleology or program. As the professor emeritus of zoology
    at Harvard University, Ernst Mayr states:
    "The proponents of teleological theories, for all their efforts, have been
    unable to find any mechanisms (except supernatural ones) that can account for
    their postulated finalism. The possibility that any such mechanism can exist has
    now been virtually ruled out by the findings of molecular biology."
    ("Scientific American", September 1978 "Evolution" issue, p.6)

    If, as you suggest Platt, Inorganic patterns are completely static, then they
    have reached a teleological goal. The MoQ does not support this view -
    patterns are continually moving towards more Dynamic states - evolution. Evolution
    is possible because patterns prefer to respond to DQ. Therefore, the Iron
    filling is responding when it prefers motion towards the magnet; this cannot be
    reduced to cause and effect, because causation is not an appropriate term in the
    MoQ; Rather, such behaviour is value motivated.
    If your conception of such motivation is causal, then you are applying a
    conceptual model other than the MoQ.

    A better account of reference is DQ motivation. Here, all patterned behaviour
    maintains its pattern because of a stable relationship with DQ. If this
    relationship changes - that is to say, if DQ becomes more or less influential, then
    the patterns change accordingly. No cause and effect here, simply SQ-SQ
    tensions.

    All the best,
    Mark

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 27 2004 - 15:39:40 GMT