From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sun Mar 28 2004 - 13:56:27 BST
Hi Mark,
> Hi Platt,
> You are tying yourself to a scientific conceptual model here. That is an
> intellectual pattern which has been replaced by the MoQ. If you imagine
> yourself to be in a cosmos where there is as yet no Carbon, Oxygen, or any
> elements other than Hydrogen or Helium, you would note the emergence of
> these elements as a result of value preferences at the subatomic level. Of
> course, you cannot do this because you are made of star dust. Star dust is
> the result of Inorganic evolution - there have to be a number of Suns born
> and gone supernova before planetary systems may evolve upon which Organic
> life may thrive - a Dynamic process.
I think we've about reached the end of our discussion of whether inorganic
patterns can still respond to DQ or not. When we start talking about other
universes, anything can be assumed. I've always presupposed that the MOQ
was about our reality, not some reality in another cosmos where perhaps
pigs can fly. So at this point I will bow out of our conversation with
thanks to you for the opportunity to express my views on the subject. Let
us hold on to our common understanding in the power of beauty to draw us
to ever higher levels of quality. For me and I'm sure for you, it's the
lure of the aesthetic continuum that keeps us constantly seeking greater
understanding.
With warm regards,
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 28 2004 - 13:54:06 BST