From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Sat Mar 27 2004 - 17:14:30 GMT
In a message dated 3/27/04 4:11:04 PM GMT Standard Time, pholden@sc.rr.com
writes:
> 'Preferences' at the inorganic occur within well-established static
> patterns. 'Choices' at this level are predictable, if not directly by
> using probability mathematics. Even at the biological level, choices are
> pretty much proscribed by static patterns of instinctual behaviour.
>
>
Hi Platt,
I feel you are once again confusing an Intellectual pattern of Quality - that
is, Mathematical modelling of substance physics, with the MoQ paradigm.
From SODV:
The fifth evidence of similarity is that probability itself may be expressed
as value, so that "a static pattern of inorganic values," which is a
definition the Metaphysics of Quality gives to "substance," is the same as "a pattern
of probabilities," which is a definition quantum theory gives to substance. If
the atomic world is composed of probability waves and if probability is equal
to value then it follows logically that the atomic world is composed of value.
You contradict yourself when you describe prediction as probability.
Probability by its nature is not predictable - there is a conceptually unknown - DQ,
at work in probability.
I do not understand why you use Scientific paradigms to limit the MoQ, when
the MoQ provides a larger framework within which Scientific paradigms can be
accommodated?
When you ask for evidence of evolution Platt, do you wish for evidence
presented in a scientific paradigm or the MoQ paradigm?
All the best,
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 27 2004 - 17:16:01 GMT